You have found a deal. Someone has pitched you. Now what? This guide covers the exact framework I wish I had before writing my first cheque into an Indian startup — the qualitative filters, the numbers to stress-test, the sector benchmarks that tell you what "good" looks like, and the red flags that are specific to the Indian market.
Most investors make the mistake of jumping straight to financials. Before you look at a single number, three qualitative questions filter 90% of deals — and if the answer to any of them is no, no spreadsheet will save it.
The single most predictive variable in early-stage investing is founder quality. Not the idea — ideas pivot. Not the market — markets shift. The question is whether this person has the combination of obsession, resilience and judgment to navigate the 7–10 years it takes to build something meaningful. At seed stage especially, you are betting on a person before a business.
Venture returns follow a power law — one winner has to return the whole fund. That requires a very large market. In India, sectors like fintech, healthtech, edtech, consumer and SaaS all have genuine scale potential. The question is whether this specific problem, solved well, can reach ₹1,000 crore in revenue within 8–10 years. If the honest answer is no, it may be a good business but it is not a venture investment.
The best NRI investors are not just writing cheques — they are opening doors to US/UK/UAE markets, making hiring introductions, validating product with Western customer perspectives. If you can genuinely help this specific company, you will get better access, better terms and a better outcome. If you can only provide capital, make sure the valuation reflects that.
If after 30 minutes with a founder you are not genuinely excited about the problem they are solving — not the numbers, not the market size, the problem — pass. The best investments feel obvious in retrospect because the investor was the right person to back that specific founder solving that specific problem. If it does not feel that way, it probably is not.
The metrics that matter are completely different depending on where the startup is. Applying Series A metrics to a pre-seed company is a common mistake — and will cause you to pass on the best early deals.
| Stage | What to focus on | What to ignore | Key question |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-seed / Idea | Founder background, insight quality, market size | Revenue, unit economics, growth rate | Does this founder uniquely understand this problem? |
| MVP / Early traction | Retention, NPS, early customer conversations | Revenue multiples, profitability | Do customers come back? Do they tell others? |
| Seed | Revenue trajectory, burn rate, runway, early CAC signals | Absolute revenue size, profitability | Is there clear evidence of product-market fit? |
| Pre-Series A | LTV/CAC ratio, gross margin, MoM growth, team quality | EBITDA | Do the unit economics work at scale? |
| Series A+ | All unit economics, burn multiple, net revenue retention, competitive moat | — | Is this business defensible and scalable? |
The scoring tool at the bottom weights metrics by stage automatically — a pre-revenue company is not penalised for empty LTV/CAC, a Series B company is heavily penalised for weak unit economics.
These are the numbers to stress-test once you have passed the qualitative filter. For each one, I have included the benchmark that should prompt a follow-up question.
Runway = cash in bank ÷ net monthly burn (burn minus revenue). This is the most important number in any early-stage company. It tells you how much time the team has before they need to raise again — and whether this raise is from a position of strength or desperation.
When a founder says "we are raising at an amazing valuation" but runway is under 6 months — that is not momentum, that is high-pressure closing. They need the money by next month, so they need your yes by this week. Smart money walks and comes back in 90 days, post-distress, at a sharper valuation.
Lifetime value divided by cost to acquire one customer. This single ratio tells you whether the business model is economically viable at scale. A ratio below 1x means you are losing money on every customer you acquire — and growing faster just accelerates the losses.
Below 1x: Business model is broken. More customers = more losses. Pass unless there is a clear and credible path to fixing this.
1–3x: Marginal. Works if the payback period is short and there are clear levers to improve.
3x+: Healthy. The business creates more value than it costs to grow. Focus shifts to how fast they can scale.
10x+: Either the model is exceptional, or the CAC is understated. Ask how CAC is calculated — blended vs marginal, paid vs organic.
Months to recoup CAC from a single customer. Under 12 months is healthy at Seed. Under 24 months is acceptable for B2B SaaS with annual contracts. Over 24 months and the business is a ticking runway problem — every new customer delays profitability instead of accelerating it.
Revenue minus cost of goods sold, divided by revenue. This tells you what percentage of each rupee of revenue is available to cover operating costs and eventually profit. Software businesses should be 70%+. Consumer and marketplace businesses 30–60%. Anything below 20% needs a clear explanation of why it improves at scale.
At seed and pre-Series A, 15–20% month-on-month revenue growth is considered strong in India. Below 10% consistently is a signal that product-market fit has not been achieved. But be careful of early-stage companies cherry-picking months — ask to see the full monthly revenue history, not just selected data points.
Net burn divided by net new ARR. This measures how efficiently the company is converting capital into growth. A burn multiple above 2x means the company is spending ₹2 to acquire ₹1 of new revenue — unsustainable at scale. Below 1x is efficient. This metric matters most at Series A and above.
If a founder is pre-revenue and gives you an LTV of ₹25,000 and CAC of ₹800, ask: based on what data? Real customers, or projections from "a similar startup we spoke to"? If it is projections, this whole metric is worth zero. At pre-revenue stage, focus on team, market and thesis instead.
Three things to pressure-test here: is the price fair, are the founders still motivated, and what is your actual ownership share after future dilution.
Revenue multiple = Post-money valuation ÷ Annualised revenue. Example: ₹100Cr post-money with ₹2Cr ARR = 50× revenue multiple. Rough Indian ceilings by stage:
| Stage | Typical ceiling | Above this = overvalued |
|---|---|---|
| Seed / Pre-Series A | 20–30× | 50×+ in a non-elite sector |
| Series A | 15–20× | 30×+ in most cases |
| Series B+ | 10–15× | 20×+ unless clear growth story |
Capital efficiency = Annualised revenue ÷ Total raised to date. A startup that raised $10M and has $2M ARR is at 0.2× efficiency (burned $5 to make $1 of revenue). At Seed+ stage, 0.5× is healthy, 0.2× is worrying, under 0.1× is a capital sinkhole. This metric is particularly useful when the company is on its third or fourth round and you want to know whether previous capital was deployed effectively.
A 45% gross margin is terrible for SaaS, great for Consumer/D2C, normal for Healthtech. Apply one-size-fits-all benchmarks and you'll over-penalise the D2C and over-reward the SaaS. Rough typical ranges for Indian startups:
| Sector | GM typical | LTV/CAC min | MoM growth | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS / B2B | 70–85% | 3–5× | 10–15% | <12m |
| Fintech | 50–70% | 3×+ | 15–20% | <18m |
| Deep tech / AI | 55–80% | 3×+ | 10%+ | <18m |
| Healthtech | 45–65% | 3×+ | 12%+ | <18m |
| Edtech | 40–60% | 2.5×+ | 15–25% | <12m |
| Consumer / D2C | 30–50% | 2×+ | 20–30% | <9m |
| Agritech | 25–40% | 2×+ | 10%+ | <24m |
| Logistics | 15–30% | 2×+ | 15%+ | <18m |
Typical Indian post-money valuations by sector × stage (all in ₹ Cr):
| Sector | Seed | Pre-Series A | Series A |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS / B2B | ₹40–200 Cr | ₹100–500 Cr | ₹300–1,500 Cr |
| Fintech | ₹40–150 Cr | ₹80–300 Cr | ₹200–800 Cr |
| Deep tech / AI | ₹40–200 Cr | ₹120–500 Cr | ₹400–2,000 Cr |
| Consumer / D2C | ₹20–80 Cr | ₹60–250 Cr | ₹200–800 Cr |
| Edtech | ₹20–80 Cr | ₹50–200 Cr | ₹150–600 Cr |
A Seed-stage SaaS at ₹250Cr post-money is expensive (top of range). A Seed-stage D2C at ₹250Cr is overvalued (well above the band). Use these as sanity checks, not dogma — every outlier needs a coherent story.
If you can, always ask: what was the last round's valuation, and when? Then compare to what they're raising at now.
Down-rounds aren't automatic disqualifiers. Sometimes the earlier valuation was set by a friends-and-family round at an absurd price, and the new one is fair. Sometimes the company genuinely pivoted and the new number reflects new reality. But always get the why — on paper, from the founder, before you commit.
Flat is fine for a quick bridge round closed 3 months after the last. Flat after 12+ months means they burned a year of runway without moving the valuation needle. That is not neutral — it is signalling risk for the next round.
The four specifics that distinguish an NRI cheque from a resident Indian's:
If you are Indian-tax-resident this financial year (RNOR or Resident), Indian LTCG rules apply to your exit (12.5% if held >24 months). TDS 10% is withheld by the buyer at sale. NRI status while holding means slightly different treatment — confirm with a CA before signing.
Some warning signs are universal. These are the ones that are more common or more severe in the Indian startup context specifically.
Before committing capital, work through this list. The checklist is ordered by what takes the least time first.
Go to mca.gov.in and look up the company. Check that it is active (not struck off), that annual filings are current, that the directors match who you have been speaking to, and look for any charged assets or legal proceedings.
LinkedIn verification, Google News search for the founder's name plus "fraud", "lawsuit", "controversy". Check previous companies on MCA if they have co-founded before. Prior failed startups are not a red flag — how they talk about the failure is.
For Seed+: last 2 years audited by a reputable firm. For pre-seed: management accounts at minimum. Full cap table showing all shareholders, their ownership percentage, and any outstanding warrants or convertible notes.
Ask the founder for their three happiest customers. Call all three. Ask them: what would they do if this product disappeared tomorrow? Their answer tells you more than any metric. If the founder cannot provide references, that is a red flag.
For any fintech, healthtech, edtech or marketplace business: ask a CA or lawyer familiar with that sector whether the current business model is at regulatory risk. Ask the founder directly what the business looks like if the regulatory interpretation changes.
Confirm the company is eligible for foreign investment under FEMA automatic route. If the deal is direct (not via a platform), ensure your CA files Form FC-GPR with RBI within 30 days of allotment.
Do this one no matter what. Email or call 2 real paying customers of the startup. Ask: "Why did you buy? Would you switch to a competitor?" 5 minutes. Catches more red flags than 5 hours with the deck.
Put the numbers in. The Scorecard calculates runway, unit economics ratios, your ownership percentage, and a weighted score (RED, AMBER, or GREEN) based on what you have entered. Stage-aware and sector-aware. Scores financial health and diligence completeness, not whether you should invest.
A high score means the numbers are clean and your due diligence is thorough. It does not mean this is the right investment for you. All early-stage investing involves a significant risk of total loss.
The full interactive Startup Scorecard lives on the Indian Startup Investing hub.
Score a deal →Covers runway, LTV/CAC, cap table, qualitative checks and the weighted RED/AMBER/GREEN score.
I invested over $60,000 in Rippl (formerly Redesyn), an Indian social commerce startup, after meeting the founders at a pitch event in Mumbai organised by Prime Securities. It is the investment that led me to build this site. Here is the honest version of what I did and did not do.
If I had to give one piece of advice to an NRI writing their first cheque into an Indian startup: spend more time on the founder and less time on the deck. The deck will change. The founder will not.
Start with Part 1The complete guide to FEMA eligibility, angel platforms, AIF funds and how to get started as an NRI investor in Indian startups.
Read Part 1 →